![]() ![]() Well I got the XG2402 at a lower price, but was really frustrated with the “overshoot” problem this OP showed in his YouTube videos. I was going to simply get the xl2411p but then I saw various reviews saying the ViewSonic XG2402 and Acer XFA240 were better. ![]() I had to upgrade due to it not having a displayport. I had the BenQ xl2411z for many years which I liked a lot except for the blacks. Wow, this thread is right up my alley! Only difference is I want a 144hz monitor instead of 240hz because I’m mainly playing games that get under 240 FPS and I read that “a 144Hz monitor 140fps looks better than a 240Hz 140fps”. If that doesn’t help then your slightly adjusted refresh rate workaround sounds very practical, although that shouldn’t be required and this is an issue that’s puzzled me for a while. You could try using a different cable or making sure you’re using the DisplayPort furthest from your motherboard to try to reduce the interference. It appears a bit like the old interference artifacts you used to get at times when using VGA and could be caused by electrical interference. I don’t know exactly what causes it or why it seems to affect some units but not others. It has been reported for both ViewSonic models and others using the panel by various users, including various BenQ and LG models. I have observed this on another XG2402, though, and one of the BenQ XL series models (I forget exactly which). I noticed this on the XG240R I reviewed but not the XG2402 review sample. This is unfortunately one of many quality control issues afflicting this old AUO panel. This recommendation of course makes no sense if you don’t own an Nvidia GPU – some alternatives are mentioned on that thread and I could try to focus on some of those if you have an AMD GPU, instead.Īh yes, the good old ‘wavy lines’ that appear to flow up or down the screen. There is still some overshoot, but if you wanted a model that has less than this you’re going to get a lot more ‘powdery trailing’ and other such pixel response weaknesses in its place. You’ll get much lower overshoot levels whilst retaining excellent ‘connected feel’ and low input lag. The Acer XN253Q X recommended there has a natively faster panel than the BenQ and also has far superior pixel response tuning. I was tempted to merge yours with it, but you’ve got quite a specific focus really so I’m happy to let this stand on its own for now. With this said, our discussion surrounding 240Hz models and those we recommend can be found in this thread. It’s a shame, because BenQ generally tunes their pixel overdrive well on their other monitor series. It’s why we tend to recommend alternatives from other manufacturers instead on this website. BenQ are known to completely overdo their pixel overdrive on their ‘XL’ and ‘RL’ series gaming monitors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |